Scientific lead
Why these candidates?
Inspect the rationale, source evidence, exclusions and open questions. Scientific usefulness would need to be assessed against the agreed research question.
A link your colleagues can review on their own. Each role should be able to see what AIS proposes, what evidence it would need, and which decisions stay with them.
Why these candidates?
Inspect the rationale, source evidence, exclusions and open questions. Scientific usefulness would need to be assessed against the agreed research question.
What does being shortlisted mean?
A place on the shortlist is a prompt for expert investigation. It does not establish safety, clinical suitability or readiness for microdosing.
How would the method be evaluated?
Agree the comparator, held-out evaluation, leakage controls and measures before a run. No validated AIS algorithm or benchmark result is presented here.
What would our systems receive?
A versioned evidence file with stable candidate IDs, reasons, source references and uncertainty. Your receiving format and integration would be agreed and tested.
How many candidates can we investigate?
Your decision gate and investigation capacity define the shortlist budget. The example of 100 to 10 is not a requirement or a promised result.
What is the first useful conversation?
A nonconfidential outline of the candidate-selection problem, the evidence available and the value an evaluation would need to demonstrate.
What would we be buying, and from whom?
Discuss a focused evaluation with agreed deliverables, acceptance criteria and a clear scope. Start with a short enquiry.
Who may use the data and outputs?
Input rights, output rights, authorised parties, IP, liability and confidentiality arrangements must be agreed before an engagement or data transfer.
Where would sensitive information go?
Use the enquiry form to describe your question. Data access, handling and retention can be agreed as part of the evaluation scope.
What is established, and what is the decision?
The offer and sample formats are prepared. Scientific performance has not been established. The next substantive decision is whether to scope a bounded evaluation.
Tell us what you have in mind.
Contact us