Synthetic format example only. No real molecules, scientific analysis or AIS method were used. Illustrative ranks are hand-authored to explain the format.
The review question
How would a partner inspect a proposed shortlist and its evidence gaps?
Example pool: 6 fictional records. Example shortlist budget: 2. This miniature sample is separate from the 100 → 10 overview illustration.
Illustrative shortlist
| Record | Rank | Illustrative rationale | Uncertainty |
|---|---|---|---|
| SYN-001 | 1 | Fictional supporting records meet the example completeness rule. | Independent confirmation absent. |
| SYN-002 | 2 | Fictional supporting records are complete; one source conflict is recorded. | The fictional source conflict remains unresolved. |
What is outside the shortlist?
- SYN-003: unresolved because an example evidence field is missing.
- SYN-004: excluded as outside the example scope; no biological conclusion follows.
- SYN-005: excluded as a fictional duplicate; no identity analysis was performed.
- SYN-006: unresolved because fictional source provenance is incomplete.
The evidence trail
Each candidate links to one fictional record, E-SYN-001 through E-SYN-006, in the synthetic evidence file. These IDs do not refer to papers or real datasets.
The expert decision remains open.
No candidate is scientifically recommended. No clinical eligibility, safety, dosing or performance conclusion is made. The sample has not undergone scientific review.
In a real evaluation, qualified reviewers would inspect supporting records, resolve conflicts and judge whether further investigation is justified.
The full manifest includes all six candidates, evidence references and limitations.